§ Form 10 Complaint for Negligence Where Plaintiff is Unable to Determine Definitely Whether the Person Responsible is C.D. or E.F. or Whether Both Are Responsible and Where His Evidence may Justify a Finding of Wilfulness or of Recklessness or of Negligence

Codes > Hawaii Revised Statutes > Hawaii Rules > Appendix of > Form 10

Form 10. Complaint for Negligence Where Plaintiff is Unable to Determine Definitely Whether the Person
Responsible is C.D. or E.F. or Whether Both Are Responsible and Where His Evidence may Justify a Finding of
Wilfulness or of Recklessness or of Negligence

    A.B., Plaintiff                                                      )
                                             v.                              )            COMPLAINT

    C.D. and E.F., Defendants )

    1. Allegation of residence of parties.

    2. On June 1, 1952, in a public highway called King Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i, defendant C.D. or defendant E.F., or both
defendants C.D. and E.F. wilfully or recklessly or negligently drove or caused to be driven a motor vehicle against plaintiff who
was then crossing said highway.

    3. As a result plaintiff was thrown down and had his leg broken and was otherwise injured, was prevented from transacting his business, suffered great pain of body and mind, and incurred expenses for medical attention and hospitalization in the sum of one thousand dollars.

    Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment against C.D. or against E.F. or against both in the sum of _______ dollars and costs.